1. (
legal definition of) "the inability to tell
right from
wrong."
(OODs 12 Mar 75) 2. evil purpose is the
cause of insanity and that's caused by an R/S. The
cause of insanity is not a "germ" that causes "mental illness" in somebody's
brain. That is not the
cause of insanity. It is not the
second dynamic. It is not because someone was interfered with as a little child. It is not because one is
fixated on panties. Insanity-pure, unadulterated insanity is an
evil purpose. Now anybody's
got some
nasty purposes but the person who is really
insane, really is
riding that one,
boy! They're
nutty as fruit cakes and it doesn't
matter how competent they are or how
incompetent they are.
(ESTO 10, 7203CO5 SO 11) 3. a refusal to allow others to be, do or have. Insanities have as their
end product,
self or
group destruction.
(HCO PL 14 Dec 70) 4. the
overt or
covert but always
complex and continuous determination to harm or
destroy.
(HCOB 28 Nov 70) 5. the five
primary Magics or out-
points as we call them are of
course the
anatomy of insanity.
(HCO PL 19 May 70) 6. insanity isn't an illness. It's an injury. When more injuries called "treatments" are piled on top of it, it becomes very
hard to treat just because the person is now desperately injured. He hurts. His nerves as physical structures carry only hurt messages. So he is
enturbulated. It's the same thing trying to-
process a
man in
agony from a car injury and trying to
process an "
insane" person. You can't really get their
attention until they
cool down.
(LRH ED 67 INT) 7. what is called "insanity" is actually a
pain crazed
condition. This would normally
pass off. Brutality and injury to "treat" it only confirm it and we get an apparently "
insane" person.
Psychiatric treatment of a person not already in a weakened
depressed condition would be bad but would not result in "insanity." A
pain crazed person then so treated is very
hard to
fish out of the
mess.
(LRH ED 67 INT) 8. the
actual point between where a person who is sane goes thereafter
insane is a very precise
point, and it's when he begins to
stop something, and at that
moment, he is
insane. Now he is
insane on that one
subject at first, and then he can get another id6e fix6 and become
insane on another
subject, and you do get
cumulative insanity, but there is no
doubt of his insanity on that one
subject.
(6711C18 SO) 9. an insanity is just total unreasonability.
(6711C18 SO)