EVALUATION

Any attempt by someone to impose his stable datum or data upon another. The first rule of the Auditor’s Code is “Do not evaluate for the preclear”.

1. the purpose of an evaluation is to isolate and handle the cause of a non-optimum situation so as to reverse and improve it toward an ideal scene. An evaluation is also done to isolate the cause of a scene which is going well and to reinforce it. (BPL 16 Dec 73) 2. 1 found that getting the situation was a common bug. Evidently people don't do a real stat analysis and get an ideal scene, look for its furthest departure and get the situation and then look for data and find the why. There are many ways to go about it but the above is easy, simple and foolproof. It would look like this on a worksheet: gross divisional statistic analysis to find the area and a conditional guess. Ideal scene for that area. Biggest depart from it for the situation. Stats, data, out-point counts, why, ethics why, who, ideal scene, handling, bright idea. If you're very good your gross divisional stat analysis will get confirmed by data. The real why opens the door to handling. And you can handle. This doesn't change eval form. It's just a working model. All good evals are very consistent-all on same railroad track. Not pies, sea lions, space ships. But pies, apples, flour, sugar, stoves. (HCO PL 19 Sept 73 IR) 3. by complete evaluation we of course mean, situation spotted, analyzed, why, recommended handling, and the agreed upon step. (7201CO2 SO) 4. evaluating tests for public individuals. (HCO PL 15 Feb 61) Abbr. Eval.

Telling the pc what to think about his case.

(1) as used here, informing a pc he has not yet completed a particular grade and that he needs further auditing. (2) the written results of evaluating (applying the technology of correctly determining why a situation is the way it is and giving a handling for correcting or improving that situation). —Staff Status II Glossary, Approved late Sept. 1990

the imposing of data or knowledge upon another. An example would be to tell another why he is the way he is instead of permitting or guiding him to discover it for himself.(1) as used here, informing a pc he has not yet completed a particular grade and that he needs further auditing. (2) the written results of evaluating (applying the technology of correctly determining why a situation is the way it is and giving a handling for correcting or improving that situation).as used here, informing a pc he has not yet completed a particular grade and that he needs further auditing.as used here, informing a pc that he has not yet completed a particular grade and that he needs further auditing.the action of enforcing one's reality upon another. The term is used specifically to describe the action of an auditor telling a preclear what to think about his case.the imposing of data or knowledge upon another. An example would be to tell another why he is the way he is instead of permitting or guiding him to discover it for himself. (Chapter 5, #57)as used here, informing a pc that he has not yet completed a particular grade and that he needs further auditing. - 5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a time on the pc's own determinism without hint or evaluation.as used here, informing a pc he has not yet completed a particular grade and that he needs further auditing. -5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a time on the pc's own determinism without hint or evaluation.(1) as used here, informing a pc he has not yet completed a particular grade and that he needs further auditing. @5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a time on the pc's own determinism without hint or evaluation. (2) the written results of evaluating (applying the technology of correctly determining why a situation is the way it is and giving a handling for correcting or improving that situation). @ It is an order that is contrary to HCO Policy Letters as issued in the Org Exec Course Volumes or subsequent to them or to LRH Executive Directives or the programs in LRH evaluations or LRH direct orders in writing.

1. telling the pc what to think about his case. (HCOB 4 Aug 60)2. evaluation for a person could be defined as the action of shaking his stable data without giving him further stable data with which he can agree or in which he can believe. (PAB 93)3. the reactive mind's conception of viewpoint. (COHA, p. 208)4. the shifting of viewpoints or the effort to do so. (PAB 8)